South Deerfield Rep. Stephen Kulik has filed an MNPA-backed bill to strengthen the enforcement provisions of the state’s open meeting laws. The bill, which has been docketed as HD 2937, would authorize courts to impose civil fines of $500 on government officials who violate the law and to award attorneys’ fees to citizens who bring actions to enforce the law. Other legislators who have so far signed on as co-sponsors are: Rep. Peter V. Kocot of Northampton, Rep. John W. Scibak of South Hadley, Rep. William M. Strauss of Mattapoisett, Sen. Stephen M. Brewer of Barre, Rep. Jay Barrows of Mansfield, and Rep. David P. Linsky of Natick.
The text of the bill as filed provides:
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 23B of Chapter 39 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2002 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking the 14th paragraph and inserting in its place the following paragraph:—
The court may impose a civil fine against the governmental body of up to one thousand dollars and a civil fine of up to five hundred dollars against each attending member of the governmental body for each meeting held in violation of this section. The fine shall not be imposed against any member of the governmental body who is recorded in opposition to the government act that is found in violation of the open meeting law. When a court finds that a meeting was held in violation of this section, it shall award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs against such governmental body. In addition, the court may assess reasonable attorney’s fees and costs against such governmental body where the court finds that:
1. after receiving notice of the filing of a complaint authorized by this section, the governmental body opens to the public any meeting or opens to the public the records of any such meeting, and
2. the requested meeting or public record are described in the complaint, and
3. the requested meeting or public record had been requested in writing by the complainant before filing the complaint, and
4. before the complaint was filed, the governmental body or custodian of the record had refused to open to the public the requested meeting or to make the requested public record available to the complainant.
SECTION 2. Section 11A ½ of Chapter 30A, of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2002 Official Edition, is hereby amended by adding thereto as the last paragraph reading as follows:
The court may impose a civil fine against the governmental body of up to one thousand dollars and a civil fine of up to five hundred dollars against each attending member of the governmental body for each meeting held in violation of this section. The fine shall not be imposed against any member of the governmental body who is recorded in opposition to the government act that is found in violation of the open meeting law. When a court holds that a meeting was held in violation of this section, it shall award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs against such governmental body. In addition, the court may assess reasonable attorney’s fees and costs against such governmental body where the count finds that:
1. after receiving notice of the filing of a complaint authorized by this section, the governmental body opens to the public any meeting or opens to the public the records of any such meeting, and
2. the requested meeting or public record are described in the complaint, and
3. the requested meeting or public record had been requested in writing by the complainant before filing the complaint, and
4. before the complaint was filed, the governmental body or custodian of the record had refused to open to the public the requested meeting or to make the requested public record available to the complainant.